<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Sports Arsenal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesportsarsenal.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesportsarsenal.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:46:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Same song, different year by CID1990</title>
		<link>http://thesportsarsenal.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/same-song-different-year/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>CID1990</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesportsarsenal.wordpress.com/?p=1169#comment-175</guid>
		<description>Edit: I meant to say that the first alumni IN SPACE will be a Q. 

I am not sure if the actual first alumni was a Q or not. I&#039;m sure he probably whistled a tune or two back in 1844-ish, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edit: I meant to say that the first alumni IN SPACE will be a Q. </p>
<p>I am not sure if the actual first alumni was a Q or not. I&#8217;m sure he probably whistled a tune or two back in 1844-ish, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Same song, different year by CID1990</title>
		<link>http://thesportsarsenal.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/same-song-different-year/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>CID1990</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesportsarsenal.wordpress.com/?p=1169#comment-174</guid>
		<description>Pretty much spot on. I also wondered about why they stuck Miguel in there once the game was unwinnable. 

The issue of large numbers of cadets roaming around outside the stadium (and all the ones we don&#039;t see who are nowhere near the place) has been sticking in my craw for a few years now.

I&#039;m sorry I missed the Randy Bresnik spot. (I&#039;m in DC)... Randy and I were in Band Company together; he was my cadre corporal. 

A couple of thoughts on Randy:

1. The first alumni of The Citadel will be a Q!

2. My Redskins fan wife wants to know if Randy can take Dan Schneider with him into space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty much spot on. I also wondered about why they stuck Miguel in there once the game was unwinnable. </p>
<p>The issue of large numbers of cadets roaming around outside the stadium (and all the ones we don&#8217;t see who are nowhere near the place) has been sticking in my craw for a few years now.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry I missed the Randy Bresnik spot. (I&#8217;m in DC)&#8230; Randy and I were in Band Company together; he was my cadre corporal. </p>
<p>A couple of thoughts on Randy:</p>
<p>1. The first alumni of The Citadel will be a Q!</p>
<p>2. My Redskins fan wife wants to know if Randy can take Dan Schneider with him into space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on College Football TV Listings, Week 4 by CID1990</title>
		<link>http://thesportsarsenal.wordpress.com/2009/09/23/college-football-tv-listings-week-4/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>CID1990</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 16:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesportsarsenal.wordpress.com/?p=1021#comment-158</guid>
		<description>A couple thoughts-

I watched on Bulldog Insider since I am in DC. What I could see of the crowd was disappointing, especially after looking for the crowd pictures you posted. I didn&#039;t see an empty seat behind General Clark.

We fixed some of the problems we had at Princeton (I attended that one), such as all the dropped balls. That being said, we allowed PC somewhere around 200 yards rushing which does not bode well. I think we may have game planned a little too much for the pass. Whatever is going on with this team (we had different issues at Princeton than we did against PC) it needs to get fixed or it is going to be a long Saturday afternoon this coming weekend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple thoughts-</p>
<p>I watched on Bulldog Insider since I am in DC. What I could see of the crowd was disappointing, especially after looking for the crowd pictures you posted. I didn&#8217;t see an empty seat behind General Clark.</p>
<p>We fixed some of the problems we had at Princeton (I attended that one), such as all the dropped balls. That being said, we allowed PC somewhere around 200 yards rushing which does not bode well. I think we may have game planned a little too much for the pass. Whatever is going on with this team (we had different issues at Princeton than we did against PC) it needs to get fixed or it is going to be a long Saturday afternoon this coming weekend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Football, Game 3:  The Citadel vs. Presbyterian by sandlapperspike</title>
		<link>http://thesportsarsenal.wordpress.com/2009/09/24/football-game-3-the-citadel-vs-presbyterian/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>sandlapperspike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesportsarsenal.wordpress.com/?p=1026#comment-156</guid>
		<description>I read last week that PC&#039;s lacrosse coach has left that school to go to Mercer, which apparently will go D-1 in 2011.  

In the case of PC moving to D-1 in all sports, it&#039;s a tough move to make, especially right now, but it says almost as much about inequities in Division II as it does the &quot;riches&quot; of Division I.  I get the impression that the school felt D-2 had become a wasteland.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read last week that PC&#8217;s lacrosse coach has left that school to go to Mercer, which apparently will go D-1 in 2011.  </p>
<p>In the case of PC moving to D-1 in all sports, it&#8217;s a tough move to make, especially right now, but it says almost as much about inequities in Division II as it does the &#8220;riches&#8221; of Division I.  I get the impression that the school felt D-2 had become a wasteland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Football, Game 3:  The Citadel vs. Presbyterian by Mike</title>
		<link>http://thesportsarsenal.wordpress.com/2009/09/24/football-game-3-the-citadel-vs-presbyterian/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesportsarsenal.wordpress.com/?p=1026#comment-155</guid>
		<description>Presbyterian is clearly using athletics to raise the profile of the school. They are the southern frontier of Division I lacrosse, at least until Jacksonville University gets underway next year. Probably not the best time to be making the leap from an economics standpoint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Presbyterian is clearly using athletics to raise the profile of the school. They are the southern frontier of Division I lacrosse, at least until Jacksonville University gets underway next year. Probably not the best time to be making the leap from an economics standpoint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Soccer:  Eleven needed for a team, more needed for a program by Mark Curran</title>
		<link>http://thesportsarsenal.wordpress.com/2009/09/10/soccer-eleven-needed-for-a-team-more-needed-for-a-program/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Curran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesportsarsenal.wordpress.com/?p=951#comment-144</guid>
		<description>For someone who does not have close ties to the women&#039;s soccer program at The Citadel, you did an excellent job summarizing the trials and tribulations of the program.  My daughter was one of the 4 graduating seniors from last year&#039;s squad, so I have a bit of perspective on this topic.  

Yes, it is extremely difficult to recruit talented female athletes to The Citadel.  It&#039;s not impossible, but very difficult.  If a young lady had a choice between playing soccer for the College of Charleston or The Citadel, very few would choose to attend The Citadel.  While the education is first class, the atmosphere is not attractive to most young women.  There are the unflattering uniforms that must be worn everywhere.  They have very few free nights and limited free weekends, especially for the freshmen (knobs). Plus there&#039;s the joy of constant verbal abuse from your upper classmates.  Add to that the reality of actually winning very few of the matches you participate in during your athletic career and its hard to imagine why anyone would subject themselves to that.  It&#039;s the road less traveled.   The accomplishment of personal goals and learning to handle stress under pressure.  And learning to handle defeat.

As for Alabama State, I&#039;m at a loss as to why their coach would have put those 8 players on a bus and driven them 7.5 hours from Montgomery, AL to Charleston, SC for these &quot;contests&quot; versus The Citadel and Charleston Southern.  Why did the AD allow them to spend their scarce resources on such a boondoggle?  Did they learn anything?  Did they improve their competitiveness?

Getting back to your original blog post, I too was surprised that they don&#039;t have a single freshman on this year&#039;s roster.  Yes, they recruited one who didn&#039;t make it beyond the first week, but if you understand the system you know that that happens at The Citadel.  You have to expect some early attrition.

Speaking of attrition, if you study the rosters of nearly any other women&#039;s soccer team in the Southern Conference, you will find that they are dominated by freshman and sophomores.  By the time many of these athletes become juniors and seniors they stop playing soccer, either to concentrate on other things or because they&#039;ve been surpassed by younger, faster players.  At The Citadel, once a player makes it through the infamous hell week, they have a very high likelihood of graduating in 4 years and playing 4 years of soccer.  Of the 6 female soccer knobs who arrived in my daughter&#039;s class, 5 now wear the ring.

Other reasons that the athletes at The Citadel tend to stay with their sport for the full 4 years are the added benefits.  Athletes have their own mess hall and have the opportunity to leave campus for out-of-town matches, while their classmates endure PT and yet another thrilling SMI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For someone who does not have close ties to the women&#8217;s soccer program at The Citadel, you did an excellent job summarizing the trials and tribulations of the program.  My daughter was one of the 4 graduating seniors from last year&#8217;s squad, so I have a bit of perspective on this topic.  </p>
<p>Yes, it is extremely difficult to recruit talented female athletes to The Citadel.  It&#8217;s not impossible, but very difficult.  If a young lady had a choice between playing soccer for the College of Charleston or The Citadel, very few would choose to attend The Citadel.  While the education is first class, the atmosphere is not attractive to most young women.  There are the unflattering uniforms that must be worn everywhere.  They have very few free nights and limited free weekends, especially for the freshmen (knobs). Plus there&#8217;s the joy of constant verbal abuse from your upper classmates.  Add to that the reality of actually winning very few of the matches you participate in during your athletic career and its hard to imagine why anyone would subject themselves to that.  It&#8217;s the road less traveled.   The accomplishment of personal goals and learning to handle stress under pressure.  And learning to handle defeat.</p>
<p>As for Alabama State, I&#8217;m at a loss as to why their coach would have put those 8 players on a bus and driven them 7.5 hours from Montgomery, AL to Charleston, SC for these &#8220;contests&#8221; versus The Citadel and Charleston Southern.  Why did the AD allow them to spend their scarce resources on such a boondoggle?  Did they learn anything?  Did they improve their competitiveness?</p>
<p>Getting back to your original blog post, I too was surprised that they don&#8217;t have a single freshman on this year&#8217;s roster.  Yes, they recruited one who didn&#8217;t make it beyond the first week, but if you understand the system you know that that happens at The Citadel.  You have to expect some early attrition.</p>
<p>Speaking of attrition, if you study the rosters of nearly any other women&#8217;s soccer team in the Southern Conference, you will find that they are dominated by freshman and sophomores.  By the time many of these athletes become juniors and seniors they stop playing soccer, either to concentrate on other things or because they&#8217;ve been surpassed by younger, faster players.  At The Citadel, once a player makes it through the infamous hell week, they have a very high likelihood of graduating in 4 years and playing 4 years of soccer.  Of the 6 female soccer knobs who arrived in my daughter&#8217;s class, 5 now wear the ring.</p>
<p>Other reasons that the athletes at The Citadel tend to stay with their sport for the full 4 years are the added benefits.  Athletes have their own mess hall and have the opportunity to leave campus for out-of-town matches, while their classmates endure PT and yet another thrilling SMI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The NCAA attacks its own (again) by hoodia</title>
		<link>http://thesportsarsenal.wordpress.com/2009/08/07/the-ncaa-attacks-its-own-again/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>hoodia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 01:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesportsarsenal.wordpress.com/?p=882#comment-132</guid>
		<description>Nice but i think something is missing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice but i think something is missing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The next baseball Hall of Famer and&#8230;the Pittsburgh Steelers by Charley</title>
		<link>http://thesportsarsenal.wordpress.com/2009/08/11/the-next-baseball-hall-of-famer-and-the-pittsburgh-steelers/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Charley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 01:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesportsarsenal.wordpress.com/?p=900#comment-121</guid>
		<description>The Hawk will get in next year, I just blogged last week on Andre Dawson&#039;s thoughts on next year&#039;s chances and his probability.  Two weeks ago I compared some of Jim Rice&#039;s stats to Andre&#039;s.  If you read that post, I think you&#039;ll agree it&#039;s a no-brainer, there is no way Andre can&#039;t be voted in.   Enjoyed the post, keep it up!

Charley
Andre Dawson for the Hall of Fame
http://hawk4thehall.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Hawk will get in next year, I just blogged last week on Andre Dawson&#8217;s thoughts on next year&#8217;s chances and his probability.  Two weeks ago I compared some of Jim Rice&#8217;s stats to Andre&#8217;s.  If you read that post, I think you&#8217;ll agree it&#8217;s a no-brainer, there is no way Andre can&#8217;t be voted in.   Enjoyed the post, keep it up!</p>
<p>Charley<br />
Andre Dawson for the Hall of Fame<br />
<a href="http://hawk4thehall.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://hawk4thehall.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trying to fill a stadium by HATS OFF TO CRABTOWN &#171; The Birddog</title>
		<link>http://thesportsarsenal.wordpress.com/2009/07/15/trying-to-fill-a-stadium/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>HATS OFF TO CRABTOWN &#171; The Birddog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesportsarsenal.wordpress.com/?p=822#comment-105</guid>
		<description>[...] Of course, we have regular commenters here that are bloggers themselves. You&#8217;ll also miss this excellent post on The Sports [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Of course, we have regular commenters here that are bloggers themselves. You&#8217;ll also miss this excellent post on The Sports [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Error on the official scorer by Mike</title>
		<link>http://thesportsarsenal.wordpress.com/2009/05/13/error-on-the-official-scorer/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesportsarsenal.wordpress.com/?p=764#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Great post. Also demonstrates the some of the fallacy of fielding percentage in general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. Also demonstrates the some of the fallacy of fielding percentage in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
